<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WordPress &#038; Deception?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/</link>
	<description>Interactive Blogging Defined</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress belongs to the community &#124; AiS.web &#124; internet services</title>
		<link>http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress belongs to the community &#124; AiS.web &#124; internet services</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 20:13:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plexav.com/archives/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I initially bumped into one of these when a friend of mine asked for a tip. I&#39;ve been reading about the issue since on Andy Wibbel&#39;s blog and on Kenneth Stein&#39;s blog. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I initially bumped into one of these when a friend of mine asked for a tip. I&#39;ve been reading about the issue since on Andy Wibbel&#39;s blog and on Kenneth Stein&#39;s blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teli Adlam</title>
		<link>http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Teli Adlam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 19:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plexav.com/archives/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-102</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You're spot on Wank.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One of my design clients, who I'd installed WP for, assumed that "all those little boxes in [his] admin panel" were official WordPress News, but was a little unsettled because he saw some links to entries of a &lt;em&gt;personal&lt;/em&gt; nature and thought something was wrong. I can understand his assumption because of the "Other WordPress News" text just above them. I promptly informed him otherwise, and removed the feeds leaving only the WP Dev Blog feed.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Point is, not everyone who just starts with WordPress will have someone to explain that those boxes &lt;em&gt;aren't&lt;/em&gt; official news stories/sources sanctioned by the WP team or Automattic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;IMO, and &lt;em&gt;only my opinion&lt;/em&gt;, the dev blog feed should be the only one there by default, especially for the less WP savvy/newbie users, or create an &lt;em&gt;official&lt;/em&gt; WP news blog that's moderated. No one starts out as a WPFanBoy(orGirl) from jump and those feeds in the dashboard can be confusing unless there's a &lt;em&gt;very clear explanation&lt;/em&gt; of what there are, right there next to them.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re spot on Wank.</p>
<p>One of my design clients, who I&#8217;d installed WP for, assumed that &#8220;all those little boxes in [his] admin panel&#8221; were official WordPress News, but was a little unsettled because he saw some links to entries of a <em>personal</em> nature and thought something was wrong. I can understand his assumption because of the &#8220;Other WordPress News&#8221; text just above them. I promptly informed him otherwise, and removed the feeds leaving only the WP Dev Blog feed.</p>
<p>Point is, not everyone who just starts with WordPress will have someone to explain that those boxes <em>aren&#8217;t</em> official news stories/sources sanctioned by the WP team or Automattic.</p>
<p>IMO, and <em>only my opinion</em>, the dev blog feed should be the only one there by default, especially for the less WP savvy/newbie users, or create an <em>official</em> WP news blog that&#8217;s moderated. No one starts out as a WPFanBoy(orGirl) from jump and those feeds in the dashboard can be confusing unless there&#8217;s a <em>very clear explanation</em> of what there are, right there next to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that girl again</title>
		<link>http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>that girl again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 13:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plexav.com/archives/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-101</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Regardless of whether Lorelle's post was officially commissioned or sanctioned by Automattic, its appearance in the Dashboard of thousands of users makes it &lt;em&gt;look&lt;/em&gt; official. I don't think this really registers with Matt. I think he takes it for granted that all WP users already know that the Dashboard feeds are a selection of posts by him and his friends syndicated for the purpose of boosting traffic to their blogs, and are not an official source of information about Wordpress. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That's a big assumption to make and I have no idea how accurate it is. Probably most people who care enough about Wordpress development to read the Dashboard are aware of its status, but I'm sure there &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; some people out there assuming that Lorelle's on staff.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of whether Lorelle&#8217;s post was officially commissioned or sanctioned by Automattic, its appearance in the Dashboard of thousands of users makes it <em>look</em> official. I don&#8217;t think this really registers with Matt. I think he takes it for granted that all WP users already know that the Dashboard feeds are a selection of posts by him and his friends syndicated for the purpose of boosting traffic to their blogs, and are not an official source of information about Wordpress. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a big assumption to make and I have no idea how accurate it is. Probably most people who care enough about Wordpress development to read the Dashboard are aware of its status, but I&#8217;m sure there <em>are</em> some people out there assuming that Lorelle&#8217;s on staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordpress Trademark Scammers? at Andy Beard</title>
		<link>http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordpress Trademark Scammers? at Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 01:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plexav.com/archives/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-103</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Kenneth Stein goes into some of the issues and questions Lorelle on Wordpress involvement (Matt quickly cleared up any misconception in the Automattic relationship with Lorelle) Matt has been portraying a &#8220;squeeky clean&#8221; image of Wordpress and Automattic since the small incident last year. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Kenneth Stein goes into some of the issues and questions Lorelle on Wordpress involvement (Matt quickly cleared up any misconception in the Automattic relationship with Lorelle) Matt has been portraying a &#8220;squeeky clean&#8221; image of Wordpress and Automattic since the small incident last year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plexav.com/archives/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry I thought I answered the question.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No one from Automattic reviewed her entry, or wrote it with her, or edited it, or sent subliminal messages in the WordPress interface suggesting she write anything.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm happy to do an interview, send me the questions via email and I'll reply in a day or two.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I thought I answered the question.</p>
<p>No one from Automattic reviewed her entry, or wrote it with her, or edited it, or sent subliminal messages in the WordPress interface suggesting she write anything.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m happy to do an interview, send me the questions via email and I&#8217;ll reply in a day or two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kenneth Stein</title>
		<link>http://www.plexav.com/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 22:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plexav.com/archives/2006/wordpress-trademarks-deception/#comment-104</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Matt, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;She might write her "own stuff," but the question I have is whether anyone from Automattic reviewed her entry about the trademark and/or co-wrote it with her.  You didn't answer the question.  That's telling.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps we could clear all this up with an interview.  Instead of communicating through comments.  If you'd be ameniable, let me know and we can set something up.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt, </p>
<p>She might write her &#8220;own stuff,&#8221; but the question I have is whether anyone from Automattic reviewed her entry about the trademark and/or co-wrote it with her.  You didn&#8217;t answer the question.  That&#8217;s telling.  </p>
<p>Perhaps we could clear all this up with an interview.  Instead of communicating through comments.  If you&#8217;d be ameniable, let me know and we can set something up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
